{"id":121014,"date":"2025-04-05T16:58:58","date_gmt":"2025-04-05T16:58:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/?p=121014"},"modified":"2025-04-05T16:58:58","modified_gmt":"2025-04-05T16:58:58","slug":"karnataka-high-court-urges-implementation-of-uniform-civil-code","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/?p=121014","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka High Court Urges Implementation Of Uniform Civil Code"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Karnataka High Court has urged both the Parliament and State Legislatures to make a concerted effort to enact a law that would bring about a Uniform Civil Code (UCC), emphasising its importance in upholding the constitutional vision of equality, secularism, and justice for all citizens-especially women.<\/p>\n<p>The strong recommendation came from a single-judge bench presided over by Justice Hanchate Sanjeev Kumar while ruling on a civil appeal involving a property dispute among siblings and the husband of a late Muslim woman, Shahnaz Begum.<\/p>\n<p>The case raised broader questions around inheritance laws governed by personal religious statutes and their implications on gender justice.<\/p>\n<p>Justice Kumar asserted that the enactment of a Uniform Civil Code, as envisioned under Article 44 of the Constitution, would fulfill the ideals enshrined in the Preamble-namely, justice, liberty, equality, fraternity, and national unity.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The country needs a Uniform Civil Code in respect of Personal Laws and religion,&#8221; the Court on April 4 observed, &#8220;only then the object of Article 14 of the Constitution of India will be achieved.&#8221; The Court underscored that although women across India are equal citizens under the Constitution, they are subjected to unequal treatment due to religion-based personal laws.<\/p>\n<p>The bench contrasted inheritance rights under Hindu and Muslim personal laws to illustrate this disparity.<\/p>\n<p>While Hindu law grants daughters equal rights in ancestral property, Muslim personal law distinguishes between brothers and sisters-granting brothers the status of &#8216;sharers&#8217; while the sisters often fall under the &#8216;residuary&#8217; category, thereby receiving a lesser share.<\/p>\n<p>Noting that states like Goa and Uttarakhand have already taken steps towards implementing a UCC, the court directed the Registrar General to send a copy of its judgment to the Principal Law Secretaries of both the union government and the Karnataka government, in the hope that legislative efforts toward enacting such a code would be initiated.<\/p>\n<p>The court also drew attention to historical support for the UCC by eminent leaders and constitutional framers.<\/p>\n<p>It cited speeches by Dr BR Ambedkar, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Dr Rajendra Prasad, T. Krishnamachari, and Maulana Hasrat Mohani, noting their backing for a uniform set of civil laws to promote national unity and equality.<\/p>\n<p>The court was adjudicating appeals filed by Samiulla Khan and others, who were contesting the distribution of properties left behind by their sister Shahnaz Begum. The plaintiffs-two brothers and a sister-claimed that both properties in question (referred to as Schedule &#8216;A&#8217; and Schedule &#8216;B&#8217;) were self-acquired by the woman who passed away, and therefore, all three plaintiffs, along with the woman&#8217;s husband (the defendant), were equally entitled to a 50-50 division.<\/p>\n<p>However, the trial court had earlier partially accepted their claim, granting each brother a 1\/10th share in both properties, the sister a 1\/20th and 1\/10th share in Schedule &#8216;A&#8217; and &#8216;B&#8217; properties respectively, and the defendant husband a majority share of 3\/4th in Schedule &#8216;A&#8217; and 1\/2 in Schedule &#8216;B&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>In the High Court, the defendant (husband) argued that the properties were not solely acquired by Shahnaz Begum and that she had not inherited any property from her father.<\/p>\n<p>The High Court carefully examined the facts and found that both Schedule &#8216;A&#8217; and &#8216;B&#8217; properties were jointly acquired by the woman who passed away and her husband, even though they were registered in her name. Schedule &#8216;B&#8217; was purchased when the husband had retired, but the Court ruled that the timing of purchase alone could not establish the property as being solely from her earnings.<\/p>\n<p>Rejecting the plaintiffs&#8217; appeal, the court ruled that the properties were joint acquisitions and not self-earned by the woman alone.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, it revised the trial court&#8217;s distribution and awarded 1\/10th share each to two brothers in both Schedule &#8216;A&#8217; and &#8216;B&#8217; properties. And awarded 1\/20th share in both Schedule &#8216;A&#8217; and &#8216;B&#8217; to the sister, treating her as a &#8216;residuary&#8217; heir under Mahomedan law.<\/p>\n<p>The defendant was awarded 3\/4th share in both properties.<\/p>\n<p>This judgment is not just a ruling on a family inheritance dispute; it carries wider legal and political implications.<\/p>\n<p>Justice Kumar&#8217;s observations on the need for a Uniform Civil Code place the spotlight once again on the long-pending directive under Article 44 of the Constitution, which states that &#8220;the State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.&#8221; While the legal suggestion by a High Court does not compel the legislature to act, it adds to the growing body of judicial opinion urging a legislative response to the issue.<\/p>\n<p><i>(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)<\/i><\/p>\n<p>\u200bThe Karnataka High Court has urged both the Parliament and State Legislatures to make a concerted effort to enact a law that would bring about a Uniform Civil Code (UCC).\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Karnataka High Court has urged both the Parliament and State Legislatures to make a concerted effort to<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":121015,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-121014","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"aioseo_notices":[],"featured_image_urls":{"full":["https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/s74m59pg_karnataka-high-court_625x300_13_August_24-PQwrQB.jpeg",1200,738,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/s74m59pg_karnataka-high-court_625x300_13_August_24-PQwrQB-150x150.jpeg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/s74m59pg_karnataka-high-court_625x300_13_August_24-PQwrQB-300x185.jpeg",300,185,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/s74m59pg_karnataka-high-court_625x300_13_August_24-PQwrQB-768x472.jpeg",640,393,true],"large":["https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/s74m59pg_karnataka-high-court_625x300_13_August_24-PQwrQB-1024x630.jpeg",640,394,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/s74m59pg_karnataka-high-court_625x300_13_August_24-PQwrQB.jpeg",1200,738,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/s74m59pg_karnataka-high-court_625x300_13_August_24-PQwrQB.jpeg",1200,738,false],"morenews-large":["https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/s74m59pg_karnataka-high-court_625x300_13_August_24-PQwrQB-825x575.jpeg",825,575,true],"morenews-medium":["https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/s74m59pg_karnataka-high-court_625x300_13_August_24-PQwrQB-590x410.jpeg",590,410,true]},"author_info":{"display_name":"","author_link":"https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/?author=0"},"category_info":"<a href=\"https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/?cat=1\" rel=\"category\">Uncategorized<\/a>","tag_info":"Uncategorized","comment_count":"0","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/121014","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=121014"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/121014\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/121015"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=121014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=121014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alertindianews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=121014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}